2001 Dodge Neon vs. 1982 Holden Gemini
To start off, 2001 Dodge Neon is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 1,816 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Gemini is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Dodge Neon (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1982 Holden Gemini. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Because 1982 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Dodge Neon (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Gemini. (105 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Dodge Neon | 1982 Holden Gemini | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Neon | Gemini |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1816 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2410 mm |