2001 Dodge Neon vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Juke (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2001 Dodge Neon. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 2001 Dodge Neon.
Because 2013 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Dodge Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Juke (240 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Juke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Dodge Neon | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Neon | Juke |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2530 mm |