2001 Dodge Ram vs. 1952 Holden FX

To start off, 2001 Dodge Ram is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,905 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Dodge Ram (173 HP) has 122 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Dodge Ram (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Dodge Ram 1952 Holden FX
Make Dodge Holden
Model Ram FX
Year Released 2001 1952
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3905 cc 2166 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 173 HP 51 HP
Torque 305 Nm 136 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 2070 kg 970 kg
Vehicle Length 4760 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 2030 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2620 mm