2001 Dodge Ram vs. 1960 Mazda R 360

To start off, 2001 Dodge Ram is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Dodge Ram (235 HP) has 219 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1434 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2001 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.

Compare all specifications: