2001 Dodge Ram vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2001 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2001 Dodge Ram. (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2001 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Dodge Ram weights approximately 195 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2001 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Dodge Ram | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3905 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2880 mm |