2001 Dodge Ram vs. 2000 Dodge Dakota

To start off, 2001 Dodge Ram is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Dodge Ram. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Dodge Ram. (447 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Dodge Ram.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Dodge Ram 2000 Dodge Dakota
Make Dodge Dodge
Model Ram Dakota
Year Released 2001 2000
Body Type Pickup Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5900 cc 4699 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 235 HP 0 HP
Torque 447 Nm 576 Nm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Length 5700 mm 4980 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1830 mm 1670 mm
Wheelbase Size 3530 mm 2850 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]