2001 Dodge Ram vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 125 more horse power than 2001 Dodge Ram. (235 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2001 Dodge Ram.
Because 2009 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2001 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Dodge Ram | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Ram | Commodore |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |