2001 Dodge Ram vs. 2009 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Dodge Ram (235 HP) has 136 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Dodge Ram weights approximately 659 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 2. (146 Nm). This means 2001 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Dodge Ram | 2009 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | 2 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 146 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1814 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 45 L |