2001 Eagle Vision vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2001 Eagle Vision is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (267 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2001 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2001 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Comet weights approximately 205 kg more than 2001 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Eagle Vision | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Eagle | Mercury |
Model | Vision | Comet |
Year Released | 2001 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 6393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |