2001 Eagle Vision vs. 1972 Holden Torana
To start off, 2001 Eagle Vision is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1972 Holden Torana. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Torana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Eagle Vision weights approximately 640 kg more than 1972 Holden Torana. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Eagle Vision | 1972 Holden Torana | |
| Make | Eagle | Holden |
| Model | Vision | Torana |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1759 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
