2001 Eagle Vision vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo
To start off, 2001 Eagle Vision is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Eagle Vision weights approximately 515 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Eagle Vision | 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo | |
| Make | Eagle | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Vision | Sapporo |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
