2001 Eagle Vision vs. 1992 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2001 Eagle Vision is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1992 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Because 1992 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Eagle Vision | 1992 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Eagle | Ford |
Model | Vision | Mustang |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |