2001 Eagle Vision vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Eagle Vision | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Eagle | Westfield |
| Model | Vision | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |
