2001 Eagle Vision vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
2001 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Eagle Vision | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Eagle | Nissan |
Model | Vision | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |