2001 Eagle Vision vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo S60 (200 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2001 Eagle Vision. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2001 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 39 kg more than 2001 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Eagle Vision | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Eagle | Volvo |
| Model | Vision | S60 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1609 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1864 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1483 mm |
