2001 Fiat Duna vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2001 Fiat Duna is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 2001 Fiat Duna. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2001 Fiat Duna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 655 kg more than 2001 Fiat Duna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Duna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Fiat Duna | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Duna | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1698 cc | 6550 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 213 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2960 mm |
