2001 Fiat Ecobasic vs. 1963 Simca 1000

To start off, 2001 Fiat Ecobasic is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Fiat Ecobasic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Fiat Ecobasic (60 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1000. (51 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Ecobasic should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Fiat Ecobasic weights approximately 26 kg more than 1963 Simca 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Simca 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Simca 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Ecobasic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Fiat Ecobasic (163 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Simca 1000. (73 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2001 Fiat Ecobasic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Simca 1000.

Compare all specifications: