2001 Fiat Ecobasic vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Fiat Ecobasic is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2001 Fiat Ecobasic. (60 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2001 Fiat Ecobasic.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Fiat Ecobasic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Fiat Ecobasic has automatic transmission and 1984 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1984 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Fiat Ecobasic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Fiat Ecobasic | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ecobasic | Ranger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4690 mm |