2001 Fiat Ecobasic vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Fiat Ecobasic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Fiat Ecobasic would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 297 more horse power than 2001 Fiat Ecobasic. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2001 Fiat Ecobasic.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Ecobasic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Fiat Ecobasic. (163 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Fiat Ecobasic. 2001 Fiat Ecobasic has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Fiat Ecobasic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Fiat Ecobasic | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Ecobasic | UTE |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |