2001 Fiat Stilo vs. 1976 Mazda 929
To start off, 2001 Fiat Stilo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Fiat Stilo (129 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 73 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Fiat Stilo (162 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Fiat Stilo | 1976 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Stilo | 929 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1122 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 65 L |