2001 Fiat Stilo vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 2001 Fiat Stilo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Fiat Stilo (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2001 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Fiat Stilo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Fiat Stilo (266 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Fiat Stilo | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Fiat | Jeep |
Model | Stilo | CJ7 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 266 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2380 mm |