2001 Fiat Stilo vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 2001 Fiat Stilo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mazda 929 (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2001 Fiat Stilo. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2001 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mazda 929 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2001 Fiat Stilo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mazda 929 (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Fiat Stilo. (114 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Fiat Stilo | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Stilo | 929 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 114 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |