2001 Fiat Stilo vs. 1992 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2001 Fiat Stilo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2001 Fiat Stilo. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2001 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Villager weights approximately 535 kg more than 2001 Fiat Stilo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Fiat Stilo | 1992 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Fiat | Mercury |
Model | Stilo | Villager |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2860 mm |