2001 Fiat Stilo vs. 2005 Pontiac Montana
To start off, 2005 Pontiac Montana is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Fiat Stilo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Fiat Stilo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Montana (200 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2001 Fiat Stilo. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 2001 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 719 kg more than 2001 Fiat Stilo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Pontiac Montana (285 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Fiat Stilo. (221 Nm). This means 2005 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Fiat Stilo. 2005 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 2001 Fiat Stilo has manual transmission. 2001 Fiat Stilo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Fiat Stilo | 2005 Pontiac Montana | |
| Make | Fiat | Pontiac |
| Model | Stilo | Montana |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2446 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 95 L |
