2001 Ford 49 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2001 Ford 49 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,899 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford 49 weights approximately 3 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford 49 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | 49 | XK |
Year Released | 2001 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3899 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1295 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2600 mm |