2001 Ford 49 vs. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2001 Ford 49 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 3,899 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford 49 (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (119 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford 49 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 7 kg more than 2001 Ford 49.
Because 2001 Ford 49 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford 49. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (181 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford 49 | 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | Ford | Daewoo |
Model | 49 | Rezzo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3899 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 181 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1305 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2610 mm |