2001 Ford 49 vs. 2000 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2001 Ford 49 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XK weights approximately 272 kg more than 2001 Ford 49. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XK (393 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford 49 | 2000 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | 49 | XK |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3899 cc | 3996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 393 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1570 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3040 mm |
