2001 Ford 49 vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Ford 49 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (242 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 652 kg more than 2001 Ford 49. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford 49. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Tundra (426 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford 49 | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | 49 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3899 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3270 mm |
