2001 Ford 49 vs. 2003 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2003 Mercury Sable is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford 49 would be higher. At 3,899 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercury Sable (152 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercury Sable weights approximately 267 kg more than 2001 Ford 49. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Ford 49 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford 49. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercury Sable (246 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 2003 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.

Compare all specifications: