2001 Ford 49 vs. 2004 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2500 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford 49 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B2500 (204 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2500 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 407 kg more than 2001 Ford 49. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford 49. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B2500 (323 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford 49 | 2004 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 49 | B2500 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3899 cc | 4031 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 323 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1705 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2990 mm |