2001 Ford 49 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford 49 would be higher. At 3,899 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford 49 weights approximately 508 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 2001 Ford 49 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford 49. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford 49 | 2005 Mitsubishi eK | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 49 | eK |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3899 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 790 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2350 mm |
