2001 Ford 49 vs. 2006 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford 49 would be higher. At 3,899 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda CR-V (157 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 692 kg more than 2001 Ford 49. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford 49. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Honda CR-V (217 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 2006 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford 49 | 2006 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | 49 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3899 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1990 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2630 mm |