2001 Ford 49 vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford 49 would be higher. At 3,899 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 733 kg more than 2001 Ford 49. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford 49. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford 49 | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | 49 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3899 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 2031 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2660 mm |