2001 Ford 49 vs. 2012 Acura RL
To start off, 2012 Acura RL is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford 49 would be higher. At 3,899 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Acura RL weights approximately 554 kg more than 2001 Ford 49. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Acura RL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford 49. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Acura RL (367 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 2012 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford 49 | 2012 Acura RL | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | 49 | RL |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3899 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 367 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1852 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2799 mm |
