2001 Ford 49 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford 49 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1188 kg more than 2001 Ford 49. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford 49 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 49 | Tundra |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3899 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 544 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 2486 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3700 mm |