2001 Ford Cougar vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2001 Ford Cougar is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Cougar (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Cougar (298 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Cougar | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Cougar | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2540 mm |
