2001 Ford Cougar vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 2001 Ford Cougar is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Cougar (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Cougar weights approximately 664 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Cougar (298 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Cougar | 1962 Mini MK I | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Cougar | MK I |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 61 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1279 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2040 mm |