2001 Ford Cougar vs. 1962 Zastava 750

To start off, 2001 Ford Cougar is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Cougar (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Cougar weights approximately 674 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Cougar (298 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: