2001 Ford Cougar vs. 1967 MG MGC
To start off, 2001 Ford Cougar is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Cougar (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1967 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1967 MG MGC.
Because 1967 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Cougar (298 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG MGC. (174 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Cougar | 1967 MG MGC | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Cougar | MGC |
Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 174 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2560 mm |