2001 Ford Cougar vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2001 Ford Cougar is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Cougar (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Cougar weights approximately 109 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Cougar (298 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Cougar | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Cougar | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1279 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
