2001 Ford Cougar vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 2001 Ford Cougar is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2001 Ford Cougar. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Cougar.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Cougar. (298 Nm). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Cougar | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Cougar | Etna |
Year Released | 2001 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 408 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 11.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2520 mm |