2001 Ford Cougar vs. 2004 Tata E
To start off, 2004 Tata E is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Cougar (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2004 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 2004 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Tata E weights approximately 91 kg more than 2001 Ford Cougar.
Because 2004 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Cougar (298 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Tata E. (210 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Cougar | 2004 Tata E | |
Make | Ford | Tata |
Model | Cougar | E |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1279 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2810 mm |