2001 Ford Cougar vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Cougar (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Cougar weights approximately 334 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Cougar (298 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (118 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Cougar | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Cougar | Polo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1423 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 118 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1279 kg | 945 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |