2001 Ford Cougar vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Cougar (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen Polo. (89 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Cougar weights approximately 122 kg more than 2010 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Cougar (298 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volkswagen Polo. (230 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Ford Cougar 2010 Volkswagen Polo
Make Ford Volkswagen
Model Cougar Polo
Year Released 2001 2010
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 1200 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 230 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1279 kg 1157 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 3970 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1682 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1462 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2470 mm