2001 Ford Econoline vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2001 Ford Econoline is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Econoline | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Econoline | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |
