2001 Ford Econoline vs. 1982 Toyota Blizzard
To start off, 2001 Ford Econoline is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Blizzard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Blizzard would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Blizzard. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Blizzard. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1982 Toyota Blizzard. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Toyota Blizzard is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Blizzard will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Blizzard. (142 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Blizzard.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econoline | 1982 Toyota Blizzard | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Econoline | Blizzard |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 2188 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2030 mm |