2001 Ford Econoline vs. 1990 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 2001 Ford Econoline is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. (299 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econoline | 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Econoline | XJ6 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1990 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 3239 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 299 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2880 mm |