2001 Ford Econoline vs. 1992 Maserati Ghibli
To start off, 2001 Ford Econoline is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Maserati Ghibli. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Maserati Ghibli would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Maserati Ghibli (302 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Maserati Ghibli should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 960 kg more than 1992 Maserati Ghibli.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Maserati Ghibli. (334 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Maserati Ghibli.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econoline | 1992 Maserati Ghibli | |
Make | Ford | Maserati |
Model | Econoline | Ghibli |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 334 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1365 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2520 mm |