2001 Ford Econoline vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01

To start off, 2001 Ford Econoline is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1225 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.

Because 2001 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.

Compare all specifications: