2001 Ford Econoline vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 2001 Ford Econoline is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura CL would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (200 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 745 kg more than 1997 Acura CL.
Because 2001 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econoline | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Econoline | CL |
Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2715 mm |